Author: Braden Decker
The original concept of the prior authorization process was well intentioned. Health plans are able to look across the continuum of care being provided to a patient and make determinations whether a single request for care is medically necessary, safe, and appropriate given everything else that is being provided to the patient. This would provide a complete view of the patient’s care.
However, the challenges in the prior authorization process have grown significantly over the last five years. According to a survey performed by the American Medical Association in 2019, 86 percent of physicians report that the prior authorization burden has increased over the last five years; 30 percent of physicians have staff dedicated to work on prior authorizations exclusively; 74 percent report that it can lead to care abandonment at least sometimes, and 90 percent report that this process results in somewhat or significant negative impacts on clinical outcomes. The process has become increasingly laborious. The burden of the process has eroded provider revenues and confidence in the health insurance industry. What’s most concerning is that it is directly affecting patient health.
Existing Solutions Fall Short
The de facto standard for prior authorization requests was introduced in 1997 and is known as X12 278. This standard continues to have a very low adoption rate, largely because it fails to accommodate the need to provide appropriate clinical documentation required by payers. Instead, most providers return to the 20th century and lean on the phone and fax machine. Yes, the fax machine.
The other approach that has gained traction over the last couple of years is the use of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) which is often inappropriately described as Artificial Intelligence. The reason for the growth of this alternative is more and more payers are allowing for the request of an authorization via the payer portal. In this case the computer attempts to mimic the steps that the human would take to request an authorization or determine the authorization status. The problems in this approach include:
- It requires complex integration into the EHR
- It is subject to changing payer web portals which can break the RPA
- It is subject to either the RPA vendor or the provider maintaining payer rule libraries which define when an authorization may be required by a payer
- It struggles in keeping up with payer requirement changes, such as CPT’s that need to be pre-authorized.
- It is not able to navigate the EHR to obtain the appropriate clinical documentation
- And finally, and most importantly, it is not capable of making decisions
The Machine Learning Approach
The future of the revenue cycle in general, and especially when it pertains to prior authorizations, is the use of machine learning. It is different from other technologies in that it is able to learn the decision making processes that are normally performed by humans. So instead of just having a bot created by engineers to perform a single task or a portion of a task, it is able to apply its knowledge to the activity and make adjustments based upon the dynamic nature of the revenue cycle. And instead of creating large databases of static payer rules maintained by humans, it is able to learn payer behavior and apply that to its decisions in real time. Modern machine learning approaches enable the complete automation of the prior authorization process in a way that builds in continuous learning. Your technology investment for automating prior authorization should be nimble and scale seamlessly with your claim volumes.
Be careful of companies that promise RPA + AI, some may have true machine learning capabilities, but many just use robotic process automation to script individual bots. In these instances the solution isn’t fully automating prior authorizations and is still subject to the 6 problems outlined above. Machine learning observes, learns, and corrects if the variables change, creating a cycle of continuous learning to ensure prior authorization is not the root of unnecessary burden for providers, payers or patients.